Humanverse

Whit vs Whitman

American parents have registered 1,287 Whits since 1880, against 901 Whitmans. Whit is still ahead, with 79 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Whit against Whitman, 1880 to 2025 0 20 40 60 80 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Whit Whitman

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 121 years in which either name was published, Whit for 85 years and Whitman for 36 years. The lead changed hands 18 times.

10 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Whit Whitman
Total US births 1,287901
Most in one year 7939
Babies in 2025 7933
Estimated living today 890770
Median age today 912
Peak year 20252018
Best rank 1,942nd boys2,994th boys
Rank in 2025 1,942nd3,450th
First recorded 18811909
Girls / boys 0 / 1,2870 / 901

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Whitmans alive today are over 12; half the Whits are over 9. That is 3 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Whit and Whitman.