Humanverse

Whitten vs Whittney

American parents have registered 1,638 Whittneys since 1880, against 538 Whittens. But in 2025 it was Whitten that was commoner, 43 babies to fewer than five.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Whitten against Whittney, 1880 to 2025 0 40 80 120 160 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Whitten Whittney

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 47 years in which either name was published, Whittney for 30 years and Whitten for 17 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Whitten Whittney
Total US births 5381,638
Most in one year 43154
Babies in 2025 43under 5
Estimated living today 5301,600
Median age today 735
Peak year 20221986
Best rank 2,919th boys1,013th girls
Rank in 2025 2,884thunranked
First recorded 19971979
Girls / boys 22 / 5161,633 / 5

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Whittneys alive today are over 35; half the Whittens are over 7. That is 28 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Whitten and Whittney.