Wright vs Wrigley
American parents have registered 1,639 Wrights since 1880, against 1,021 Wrigleys. But in 2025 it was Wrigley that was commoner, 57 babies to 24.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Wright Wrigley
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 130 years in which either name was published, Wright for 107 years and Wrigley for 23 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Wright | Wrigley | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,639 | 1,021 |
| Most in one year | 35 | 122 |
| Babies in 2025 | 24 | 57 |
| Estimated living today | 690 | 1,000 |
| Median age today | 31 | 8 |
| Peak year | 1915 | 2017 |
| Best rank | 1,082nd boys | 2,295th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 4,249th | 2,765th |
| First recorded | 1880 | 2003 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 1,639 | 408 / 613 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Wrights alive today are over 31; half the Wrigleys are over 8. That is 23 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Wright and Wrigley.