Humanverse

Zillah vs Zilpha

American parents have registered 570 Zilphas since 1880, against 552 Zillahs. But in 2025 it was Zillah that was commoner, 15 babies to fewer than five.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Zillah against Zilpha, 1880 to 2025 0 6 12 18 24 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Zillah Zilpha

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 83 years in which either name was published, Zilpha for 47 years and Zillah for 36 years. The lead changed hands 17 times.

11 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Zillah Zilpha
Total US births 552570
Most in one year 2024
Babies in 2025 15under 5
Estimated living today 27020
Median age today 1087
Peak year 20241918
Best rank 5,962nd girls1,645th girls
Rank in 2025 7,133rdunranked
First recorded 18811880
Girls / boys 552 / 0570 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Zilphas alive today are over 87; half the Zillahs are over 10. That is 77 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Zillah and Zilpha.