Ranae
About 2,439 American babies have been named Ranae since 1931, most of them around 1962. It has not appeared in the national data since 2024. About 2,100 Ranaes are alive in the United States today, and half of them are over 56.
Popularity, 1880–2025
girls named Ranae
By the numbers
- Total US births
- 2,439
- Estimated living today
- 2,100
- Median age today
- 56
- Peak year
- 1962
- Best rank
- 1,220th
- Rank in 2025
- unranked
- First recorded
- 1931
How old the living Ranaes are
born that year still alive today
Of the 2,439 babies given the name since 1931, about 2,100 are alive — 86 in every hundred. Roughly 150 of them are children and 570 are 65 or over. The dotted line is the median: half were born before 1969 and half after.
An estimate, not a count. SSA births aged forward through SSA cohort life tables, which know nothing about who left the country or arrived in it — so for a name that mostly came to America rather than being born in it, this is a floor rather than a figure. Where you fall among living Americans.
Where Ranae is most common
Relative to how many babies each state records, Ranae is most concentrated in Utah (50.5×), Iowa (11.5×), Idaho (8.0×), Minnesota (4.1×).
Total births recorded in each state since 1910. Browse names by state.
Names of 1962
The most popular girls’ names the year Ranae peaked:
Ranae elsewhere
| Country | Spelling | Births | Best rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| England and Wales girls | Ranae | 9 | 5,876th |
Counts come from each country's own records and are not comparable with the US figures above, which cover different years and a different definition of a recorded name. Where a country writes the name several ways, the spellings are added together and the most common is shown. A row marked name registrations is counting something else: Portugal ranks each of a child's two given names separately, so a girl registered Maria Leonor is in both the Maria row and the Leonor row, and that figure is not a number of children.
Related names
Ranae against another name
Two names on one chart, with the year one overtook the other.
Try it on yourself
Source: US Social Security Administration, national and state baby-name files, 1880–2025. Counts include only births registered with the SSA, and names with fewer than five births in a year are not published. The living estimate applies SSA cohort life tables to those births; it counts people born in the United States, so it misses anyone who arrived later and anyone who has left.