Humanverse

Retha

Retha reached its high-water mark in 1924 at number 438, and has been recorded 10,597 times in all. It has not appeared in the national data since 2014. About 4,000 Rethas are alive in the United States today, and half of them are over 72.

Popularity, 1880–2025

Births per year, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

girls named Retha

By the numbers

Total US births
10,597
Estimated living today
4,000
Median age today
72
Peak year
1924
Best rank
438th
Rank in 2025
unranked
First recorded
1884

How old the living Rethas are

Born with the name each year, and how many of them are alive today, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

born that year still alive today

Of the 10,597 babies given the name since 1884, about 4,000 are alive — 37 in every hundred. Roughly 5 of them are children and 2,900 are 65 or over. The dotted line is the median: half were born before 1953 and half after.

An estimate, not a count. SSA births aged forward through SSA cohort life tables, which know nothing about who left the country or arrived in it — so for a name that mostly came to America rather than being born in it, this is a floor rather than a figure. Where you fall among living Americans.

Where Retha is most common

Relative to how many babies each state records, Retha is most concentrated in Arkansas (7.4×), Oklahoma (5.6×), West Virginia (5.4×), North Carolina (4.5×).

Total births recorded in each state since 1910. Browse names by state.

Names of 1924

The most popular girls’ names the year Retha peaked:

All the names of 1924

Related names

Retha against another name

Two names on one chart, with the year one overtook the other.

Compare Retha with a name of your own

Try it on yourself

Source: US Social Security Administration, national and state baby-name files, 1880–2025. Counts include only births registered with the SSA, and names with fewer than five births in a year are not published. The living estimate applies SSA cohort life tables to those births; it counts people born in the United States, so it misses anyone who arrived later and anyone who has left.