Baby names of 1964
Lisa and Michael topped the lists in 1964, out of 3,887,553 births recorded across 11,214 different names. That is 1.8% fewer than the 1963 files hold. About 3.3 million of them are alive today.
Girls
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lisa | 54,270 |
| 2 | Mary | 40,985 |
| 3 | Susan | 31,515 |
| 4 | Karen | 30,243 |
| 5 | Patricia | 26,091 |
| 6 | Kimberly | 24,128 |
| 7 | Donna | 23,808 |
| 8 | Linda | 23,629 |
| 9 | Cynthia | 20,321 |
| 10 | Tammy | 20,043 |
| 11 | Pamela | 19,823 |
| 12 | Deborah | 19,306 |
| 13 | Sandra | 19,249 |
| 14 | Laura | 18,967 |
| 15 | Lori | 18,624 |
| 16 | Elizabeth | 17,294 |
| 17 | Julie | 17,283 |
| 18 | Brenda | 17,106 |
| 19 | Barbara | 16,481 |
| 20 | Sharon | 16,449 |
| 21 | Teresa | 16,420 |
| 22 | Angela | 16,256 |
| 23 | Michelle | 16,180 |
| 24 | Debra | 15,329 |
| 25 | Denise | 14,726 |
All 200 girls’ names of 1964 (7,806 recorded)
Boys
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael | 82,617 |
| 2 | John | 82,508 |
| 3 | David | 75,043 |
| 4 | James | 73,026 |
| 5 | Robert | 69,980 |
| 6 | Mark | 45,261 |
| 7 | William | 44,224 |
| 8 | Richard | 40,098 |
| 9 | Thomas | 34,463 |
| 10 | Jeffrey | 30,728 |
| 11 | Joseph | 30,576 |
| 12 | Steven | 29,707 |
| 13 | Kevin | 29,357 |
| 14 | Scott | 28,506 |
| 15 | Timothy | 28,090 |
| 16 | Paul | 26,874 |
| 17 | Charles | 25,908 |
| 18 | Kenneth | 24,850 |
| 19 | Daniel | 24,342 |
| 20 | Brian | 24,167 |
| 21 | Anthony | 20,126 |
| 22 | Gregory | 19,884 |
| 23 | Christopher | 19,627 |
| 24 | Ronald | 18,844 |
| 25 | Donald | 18,045 |
All 200 boys’ names of 1964 (4,594 recorded)
Biggest climbers, girls
Names that gained the most ground on 1963:
Biggest climbers, boys
Names that gained the most ground on 1963:
First recorded in 1964, girls
Names the SSA had never published before 1964:
First recorded in 1964, boys
Names the SSA had never published before 1964:
Try it on yourself
Source: US Social Security Administration national baby-name files. Names given to fewer than five babies in a year are not published, so the totals here run below the true number of births. How far below is not the same in every year: the files hold 201,484 births for 1880 and 3,315,343 for 2025, so a change from one year to the next in the early decades is partly a change in what the record covers.