Humanverse

Claiborne vs Clarence

American parents have registered 305,423 Clarences since 1880, against 1,237 Claibornes. Clarence is still ahead, with 117 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Claiborne against Clarence, 1880 to 2025 0 2k 4k 6k 8k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Claiborne Clarence

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Clarence has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2016, when Claiborne had 13 and Clarence had 156.

Side by side

  Claiborne Clarence
Total US births 1,237305,423
Most in one year 277,367
Babies in 2025 under 5117
Estimated living today 60083,000
Median age today 5166
Peak year 19181921
Best rank 1,373rd boys28th boys
Rank in 2025 unranked1,499th
First recorded 18891880
Girls / boys 27 / 1,2101,859 / 303,564

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Clarences alive today are over 66; half the Claibornes are over 51. That is 15 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Claiborne and Clarence.