Humanverse

Claiborne vs Claude

American parents have registered 92,289 Claudes since 1880, against 1,237 Claibornes. Claude is still ahead, with 40 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Claiborne against Claude, 1880 to 2025 0 500 1k 1.5k 2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Claiborne Claude

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Claude has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2016, when Claiborne had 13 and Claude had 55.

Side by side

  Claiborne Claude
Total US births 1,23792,289
Most in one year 271,910
Babies in 2025 under 540
Estimated living today 60028,000
Median age today 5167
Peak year 19181920
Best rank 1,373rd boys92nd boys
Rank in 2025 unranked3,036th
First recorded 18891880
Girls / boys 27 / 1,210952 / 91,337

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Claudes alive today are over 67; half the Claibornes are over 51. That is 16 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Claiborne and Claude.