Earlene vs Earley
American parents have registered 14,170 Earlenes since 1880, against 581 Earleys. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Earlene Earley
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 104 years in which either name was published, Earlene for 97 years and Earley for 7 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Earlene | Earley | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 14,170 | 581 |
| Most in one year | 407 | 21 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 6,700 | 130 |
| Median age today | 74 | 73 |
| Peak year | 1947 | 1921 |
| Best rank | 401st girls | 1,703rd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1901 | 1885 |
| Girls / boys | 14,165 / 5 | 0 / 581 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Earlene and Earley.