Humanverse

Glyn vs Glynda

American parents have registered 2,425 Glyndas since 1880, against 1,475 Glyns. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Glyn against Glynda, 1880 to 2025 0 40 80 120 160 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Glyn Glynda

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 79 years in which either name was published, Glynda for 45 years and Glyn for 34 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.

Side by side

  Glyn Glynda
Total US births 1,4752,425
Most in one year 44121
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 6001,700
Median age today 6872
Peak year 19341947
Best rank 1,038th boys787th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19121925
Girls / boys 92 / 1,3832,425 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Glyndas alive today are over 72; half the Glyns are over 68. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Glyn and Glynda.