Humanverse

Glynda vs Glynis

American parents have registered 2,425 Glyndas since 1880, against 2,024 Glynises. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Glynda against Glynis, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Glynda Glynis

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 74 years in which either name was published, Glynda for 37 years and Glynis for 37 years. The lead changed hands 15 times.

12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Glynda Glynis
Total US births 2,4252,024
Most in one year 121283
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 1,7001,700
Median age today 7262
Peak year 19471963
Best rank 787th girls596th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19251939
Girls / boys 2,425 / 02,014 / 10

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Glyndas alive today are over 72; half the Glynises are over 62. That is 10 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Glynda and Glynis.