Baby names of 2002
Emily and Jacob topped the lists in 2002, out of 3,738,396 births recorded across 28,290 different names. That is 0.1% fewer than the 2001 files hold. About 3.7 million of them are alive today.
Girls
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emily | 24,470 |
| 2 | Madison | 21,774 |
| 3 | Hannah | 18,828 |
| 4 | Emma | 16,558 |
| 5 | Alexis | 15,636 |
| 6 | Ashley | 15,344 |
| 7 | Abigail | 15,303 |
| 8 | Sarah | 14,779 |
| 9 | Samantha | 14,671 |
| 10 | Olivia | 14,631 |
| 11 | Elizabeth | 14,621 |
| 12 | Alyssa | 12,847 |
| 13 | Lauren | 12,327 |
| 14 | Isabella | 12,171 |
| 15 | Grace | 12,056 |
| 16 | Jessica | 11,921 |
| 17 | Brianna | 11,524 |
| 18 | Taylor | 11,468 |
| 19 | Kayla | 11,310 |
| 20 | Anna | 10,398 |
| 21 | Victoria | 9,785 |
| 22 | Megan | 9,210 |
| 23 | Sydney | 9,034 |
| 24 | Rachel | 8,944 |
| 25 | Chloe | 8,902 |
All 200 girls’ names of 2002 (18,086 recorded)
Boys
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacob | 30,586 |
| 2 | Michael | 28,258 |
| 3 | Joshua | 25,998 |
| 4 | Matthew | 25,154 |
| 5 | Ethan | 22,113 |
| 6 | Andrew | 22,037 |
| 7 | Joseph | 21,920 |
| 8 | Christopher | 21,689 |
| 9 | Nicholas | 21,390 |
| 10 | Daniel | 21,352 |
| 11 | William | 20,136 |
| 12 | Anthony | 19,590 |
| 13 | David | 18,704 |
| 14 | Tyler | 18,266 |
| 15 | Alexander | 17,718 |
| 16 | Ryan | 17,658 |
| 17 | John | 17,477 |
| 18 | James | 16,968 |
| 19 | Zachary | 16,622 |
| 20 | Brandon | 16,282 |
| 21 | Jonathan | 15,514 |
| 22 | Justin | 14,906 |
| 23 | Dylan | 14,821 |
| 24 | Christian | 14,597 |
| 25 | Samuel | 14,579 |
All 200 boys’ names of 2002 (12,489 recorded)
Biggest climbers, girls
Names that gained the most ground on 2001:
Biggest climbers, boys
Names that gained the most ground on 2001:
First recorded in 2002, girls
Names the SSA had never published before 2002:
First recorded in 2002, boys
Names the SSA had never published before 2002:
Try it on yourself
Source: US Social Security Administration national baby-name files. Names given to fewer than five babies in a year are not published, so the totals here run below the true number of births. How far below is not the same in every year: the files hold 201,484 births for 1880 and 3,315,343 for 2025, so a change from one year to the next in the early decades is partly a change in what the record covers.