Baby names of 2010
Isabella and Jacob topped the lists in 2010, out of 3,696,271 births recorded across 31,664 different names. That is 3.3% fewer than the 2009 files hold. About 3.7 million of them are alive today.
Girls
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Isabella | 22,936 |
| 2 | Sophia | 20,656 |
| 3 | Emma | 17,366 |
| 4 | Olivia | 17,040 |
| 5 | Ava | 15,444 |
| 6 | Emily | 14,281 |
| 7 | Abigail | 14,257 |
| 8 | Madison | 13,196 |
| 9 | Chloe | 11,765 |
| 10 | Mia | 10,650 |
| 11 | Addison | 10,334 |
| 12 | Elizabeth | 10,283 |
| 13 | Ella | 9,884 |
| 14 | Natalie | 8,789 |
| 15 | Samantha | 8,411 |
| 16 | Alexis | 8,279 |
| 17 | Lily | 7,992 |
| 18 | Grace | 7,692 |
| 19 | Hailey | 7,027 |
| 20 | Hannah | 6,999 |
| 21 | Alyssa | 6,993 |
| 22 | Lillian | 6,957 |
| 23 | Avery | 6,677 |
| 24 | Leah | 6,545 |
| 25 | Nevaeh | 6,446 |
All 200 girls’ names of 2010 (19,841 recorded)
Boys
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacob | 22,157 |
| 2 | Ethan | 18,020 |
| 3 | Michael | 17,387 |
| 4 | Jayden | 17,203 |
| 5 | William | 17,072 |
| 6 | Alexander | 16,769 |
| 7 | Noah | 16,481 |
| 8 | Daniel | 15,869 |
| 9 | Aiden | 15,547 |
| 10 | Anthony | 15,511 |
| 11 | Joshua | 15,467 |
| 12 | Mason | 14,858 |
| 13 | Christopher | 14,299 |
| 14 | Andrew | 14,269 |
| 15 | David | 14,222 |
| 16 | Matthew | 14,148 |
| 17 | Logan | 14,032 |
| 18 | Elijah | 13,920 |
| 19 | James | 13,901 |
| 20 | Joseph | 13,851 |
| 21 | Gabriel | 12,891 |
| 22 | Benjamin | 12,439 |
| 23 | Ryan | 11,981 |
| 24 | Samuel | 11,971 |
| 25 | Jackson | 11,823 |
All 200 boys’ names of 2010 (14,270 recorded)
Biggest climbers, girls
Names that gained the most ground on 2009:
Biggest climbers, boys
Names that gained the most ground on 2009:
First recorded in 2010, girls
Names the SSA had never published before 2010:
First recorded in 2010, boys
Names the SSA had never published before 2010:
Try it on yourself
Source: US Social Security Administration national baby-name files. Names given to fewer than five babies in a year are not published, so the totals here run below the true number of births. How far below is not the same in every year: the files hold 201,484 births for 1880 and 3,315,343 for 2025, so a change from one year to the next in the early decades is partly a change in what the record covers.