Humanverse

Esma vs Esmee

American parents have registered 915 Esmas since 1880, against 860 Esmees. But in 2025 it was Esmee that was commoner, 47 babies to 24.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Esma against Esmee, 1880 to 2025 0 20 40 60 80 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Esma Esmee

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 68 years in which either name was published, Esma for 48 years and Esmee for 20 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.

Side by side

  Esma Esmee
Total US births 915860
Most in one year 3978
Babies in 2025 2447
Estimated living today 540860
Median age today 98
Peak year 20192019
Best rank 3,788th girls2,305th girls
Rank in 2025 5,238th3,296th
First recorded 18902000
Girls / boys 915 / 0860 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Esma Esmee
France 3,8855,345 Esmée
England and Wales 4252,611
Belgium 7472,037 Esmée
Switzerland 521100 Esmée
Poland 123

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Esma and Esmee.