Baby names of 2005
Emily and Jacob topped the lists in 2005, out of 3,845,147 births recorded across 30,174 different names. That is 0.6% more than the 2004 files hold. About 3.8 million of them are alive today.
Girls
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emily | 23,952 |
| 2 | Emma | 20,362 |
| 3 | Madison | 19,578 |
| 4 | Abigail | 15,756 |
| 5 | Olivia | 15,700 |
| 6 | Isabella | 15,197 |
| 7 | Hannah | 14,854 |
| 8 | Samantha | 13,642 |
| 9 | Ava | 13,606 |
| 10 | Ashley | 13,276 |
| 11 | Elizabeth | 12,743 |
| 12 | Sophia | 12,678 |
| 13 | Alexis | 11,977 |
| 14 | Grace | 11,865 |
| 15 | Sarah | 11,555 |
| 16 | Alyssa | 10,891 |
| 17 | Mia | 10,846 |
| 18 | Natalie | 10,742 |
| 19 | Chloe | 9,598 |
| 20 | Brianna | 9,370 |
| 21 | Lauren | 9,249 |
| 22 | Anna | 9,113 |
| 23 | Ella | 9,072 |
| 24 | Taylor | 8,676 |
| 25 | Kayla | 8,620 |
All 200 girls’ names of 2005 (19,199 recorded)
Boys
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacob | 25,851 |
| 2 | Michael | 23,828 |
| 3 | Joshua | 23,261 |
| 4 | Matthew | 21,483 |
| 5 | Ethan | 21,318 |
| 6 | Andrew | 20,742 |
| 7 | Daniel | 20,236 |
| 8 | Anthony | 19,387 |
| 9 | Joseph | 19,241 |
| 10 | Christopher | 19,174 |
| 11 | William | 19,060 |
| 12 | David | 18,144 |
| 13 | Alexander | 18,130 |
| 14 | Ryan | 17,990 |
| 15 | Nicholas | 17,076 |
| 16 | Tyler | 16,989 |
| 17 | James | 16,140 |
| 18 | John | 15,796 |
| 19 | Jonathan | 14,443 |
| 20 | Nathan | 14,365 |
| 21 | Samuel | 14,271 |
| 22 | Christian | 14,210 |
| 23 | Noah | 13,905 |
| 24 | Dylan | 13,782 |
| 25 | Benjamin | 13,586 |
All 200 boys’ names of 2005 (13,370 recorded)
Biggest climbers, girls
Names that gained the most ground on 2004:
Biggest climbers, boys
Names that gained the most ground on 2004:
First recorded in 2005, girls
Names the SSA had never published before 2005:
First recorded in 2005, boys
Names the SSA had never published before 2005:
Try it on yourself
Source: US Social Security Administration national baby-name files. Names given to fewer than five babies in a year are not published, so the totals here run below the true number of births. How far below is not the same in every year: the files hold 201,484 births for 1880 and 3,315,343 for 2025, so a change from one year to the next in the early decades is partly a change in what the record covers.