Baby names of 2006
Emily and Jacob topped the lists in 2006, out of 3,956,482 births recorded across 31,651 different names. That is 2.9% more than the 2005 files hold. About 3.9 million of them are alive today.
Girls
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emily | 21,412 |
| 2 | Emma | 19,133 |
| 3 | Madison | 18,635 |
| 4 | Isabella | 18,231 |
| 5 | Ava | 16,941 |
| 6 | Abigail | 15,633 |
| 7 | Olivia | 15,508 |
| 8 | Hannah | 14,556 |
| 9 | Sophia | 13,503 |
| 10 | Samantha | 12,470 |
| 11 | Elizabeth | 12,440 |
| 12 | Ashley | 12,353 |
| 13 | Mia | 12,027 |
| 14 | Alexis | 11,239 |
| 15 | Sarah | 11,161 |
| 16 | Grace | 10,974 |
| 17 | Natalie | 10,951 |
| 18 | Chloe | 10,404 |
| 19 | Alyssa | 10,177 |
| 20 | Brianna | 9,370 |
| 21 | Ella | 9,213 |
| 22 | Anna | 8,613 |
| 23 | Taylor | 8,566 |
| 24 | Lauren | 8,498 |
| 25 | Hailey | 8,423 |
All 200 girls’ names of 2006 (20,064 recorded)
Boys
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacob | 24,871 |
| 2 | Michael | 22,653 |
| 3 | Joshua | 22,336 |
| 4 | Ethan | 20,522 |
| 5 | Matthew | 20,339 |
| 6 | Daniel | 20,082 |
| 7 | Andrew | 19,733 |
| 8 | Christopher | 19,688 |
| 9 | Anthony | 19,413 |
| 10 | William | 18,965 |
| 11 | Joseph | 18,471 |
| 12 | Alexander | 18,235 |
| 13 | David | 17,671 |
| 14 | Ryan | 16,434 |
| 15 | Noah | 16,342 |
| 16 | James | 16,255 |
| 17 | Nicholas | 15,675 |
| 18 | Tyler | 15,550 |
| 19 | John | 15,177 |
| 20 | Logan | 15,151 |
| 21 | Christian | 14,487 |
| 22 | Jonathan | 14,387 |
| 23 | Nathan | 14,278 |
| 24 | Benjamin | 13,766 |
| 25 | Samuel | 13,652 |
All 200 boys’ names of 2006 (14,047 recorded)
Biggest climbers, girls
Names that gained the most ground on 2005:
Biggest climbers, boys
Names that gained the most ground on 2005:
First recorded in 2006, girls
Names the SSA had never published before 2006:
First recorded in 2006, boys
Names the SSA had never published before 2006:
Try it on yourself
Source: US Social Security Administration national baby-name files. Names given to fewer than five babies in a year are not published, so the totals here run below the true number of births. How far below is not the same in every year: the files hold 201,484 births for 1880 and 3,315,343 for 2025, so a change from one year to the next in the early decades is partly a change in what the record covers.