Baby names of 2007
Emily and Jacob topped the lists in 2007, out of 3,998,031 births recorded across 32,440 different names. That is 1.1% more than the 2006 files hold. About 4 million of them are alive today.
Girls
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emily | 19,367 |
| 2 | Isabella | 19,143 |
| 3 | Emma | 18,390 |
| 4 | Ava | 18,053 |
| 5 | Madison | 17,968 |
| 6 | Sophia | 17,031 |
| 7 | Olivia | 16,589 |
| 8 | Abigail | 15,476 |
| 9 | Hannah | 13,323 |
| 10 | Elizabeth | 13,071 |
| 11 | Addison | 11,949 |
| 12 | Samantha | 11,883 |
| 13 | Ashley | 11,428 |
| 14 | Alyssa | 11,275 |
| 15 | Mia | 10,922 |
| 16 | Chloe | 10,759 |
| 17 | Natalie | 10,443 |
| 18 | Sarah | 10,014 |
| 19 | Alexis | 9,923 |
| 20 | Grace | 9,769 |
| 21 | Ella | 9,554 |
| 22 | Brianna | 8,855 |
| 23 | Hailey | 8,439 |
| 24 | Taylor | 7,965 |
| 25 | Anna | 7,901 |
All 200 girls’ names of 2007 (20,584 recorded)
Boys
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacob | 24,310 |
| 2 | Michael | 22,027 |
| 3 | Ethan | 21,041 |
| 4 | Joshua | 20,669 |
| 5 | Daniel | 20,268 |
| 6 | Christopher | 20,030 |
| 7 | Anthony | 19,639 |
| 8 | William | 18,898 |
| 9 | Matthew | 18,756 |
| 10 | Andrew | 18,461 |
| 11 | Alexander | 18,150 |
| 12 | David | 17,573 |
| 13 | Joseph | 17,364 |
| 14 | Noah | 16,605 |
| 15 | James | 15,973 |
| 16 | Ryan | 15,722 |
| 17 | Logan | 15,331 |
| 18 | Jayden | 15,251 |
| 19 | John | 14,447 |
| 20 | Nicholas | 14,362 |
| 21 | Tyler | 14,106 |
| 22 | Christian | 14,063 |
| 23 | Jonathan | 13,809 |
| 24 | Nathan | 13,605 |
| 25 | Samuel | 13,367 |
All 200 boys’ names of 2007 (14,394 recorded)
Biggest climbers, girls
Names that gained the most ground on 2006:
Biggest climbers, boys
Names that gained the most ground on 2006:
First recorded in 2007, girls
Names the SSA had never published before 2007:
First recorded in 2007, boys
Names the SSA had never published before 2007:
Jayel is here because the boys’ file records it: the SSA publishes every name given to five or more babies of one sex, and a rank is a position within that list. It is not a claim about whose name it is.
Try it on yourself
Source: US Social Security Administration national baby-name files. Names given to fewer than five babies in a year are not published, so the totals here run below the true number of births. How far below is not the same in every year: the files hold 201,484 births for 1880 and 3,315,343 for 2025, so a change from one year to the next in the early decades is partly a change in what the record covers.